East of Eden Section 3 Discussion: Timshel
Sorry that I’ve been a neglectful book club host, but I think this is just the thing to get us back in the swing of things! Also, please feel free to go back and comment on any previous discussion questions you may have missed.
Sometimes I think that if I carried around a little piece of paper that said timshel on it and looked at it throughout the day I’d be a better person. Other than the Cathy/monster passage, which is memorable for entirely different reasons, my absolute favorite passage in the entire book is the one where Adam, Lee, and Samuel discuss the story of Cain and Abel. There’s so much goodness in that surprisingly short passage but, most meaningful of all (to me, at least), is timshel.
Lee’s hand shook as he filled the delicate cups. He drank his down in one gulp. “Don’t you see? he cried. “The American Standard translation orders men to triumph over sin, and you can call sin ignorance. The King James translation makes a promise in ‘Thou shalt,’ meaning that men will surely triumph over sin. But the Hebrew word, the word timshel-‘Thou mayest’-that gives a choice. It might be the most important word in the world. That says the way is open. That throws it right back on a man. For if ‘Thou mayest’-it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.’ Do you see? …
…But ‘Thou mayest’! Why, that makes a man great, that gives him stature with the gods, for in his weakness and his filth and his murder of his brother he still has the great choice. He can choose his course and fight through and win.” Lee’s voice was a chant of triumph
Pages 301-302
Thoughts? Opinions?
Emma 3:21 pm on February 26, 2010 Permalink |
Welcome back! I just checked yesterday if was RSS feed was still working.
This is also my favorite passage. Especially having studied that passage in Hebrew, and the text is corrupted and very difficult to interpret in Hebrew, I was amazed to find this discussion in a novel, and a very good discussion at that. It seems Steinbeck did a very serious homework on that.
hip chick 5:25 am on February 28, 2010 Permalink |
Yes I loved this as well. It’s hard to add much to it as it’s pretty much perfection in itself. I found myself rereading and knowing that it was something that I would remember to apply to my life as well.
anilak_99 1:28 pm on March 2, 2010 Permalink |
I’ve been thinking about this passage as well, in particular in relation to the Cathy monster passage. They seem to be at odds with one another- on the one hand, Steinbeck seems to highlight that we have a choice to overcome our death (or evil) instincts. We see this later in the book when Lee gets angry at Cal for believing he has bad blood in him.
On the other hand, if we examine Cathy’s character, she appears to me to be so unassailably evil; there is no struggle within her, no conscience (perhaps small glimpses but these are very unconvincing). From the very beginning Steinbeck portrays her as a lost cause, without prospect for redemption. Indeed, at no point do I ever empathize with her, she has no remorse and really no hope for any kind of salvation and I cant really reconcile this portrayal of her with this later testimony to free will. Not to say that she is incapable of it, but as a reader, I have already written her off, which is the opposite of what this passage is trying to teach us.
Ronnica 11:40 am on March 5, 2010 Permalink |
I love how Stienbeck makes this point, through the discussion of his charcters…and then he makes the point through the actions/thoughts of his characters throughout the rest of the book.
rebeccareid 2:30 pm on March 26, 2010 Permalink |
I do love the entire concept of TIMSHEL and I love seeing how it relates to the entire book. Each character has to make their own choices.