We Have Always Lived In The Castle Ch’s 9 & 10
I have to apologize to everyone for not having this post up in time!! It totally got away from me. Maybe subconsciously I was trying to avoid it because it’s our last discussion of the book
I’ve had such a great time talking about this book with everyone and reading everyone’s comments about it! It really has been quite the fun read. But alas, all things must come to an end, and what an interesting end We Have Always Lived in the Castle has come to.
Did anyone find the ending anti-climatic? At first I did. I wanted more answers. Maybe not more answers, maybe that’s not the right term, but I wanted to see things play out more. We never learn much more about Uncle Julian’s death and the girls’ reaction is a bit strange…not much of a reaction at all really. I found it odd that the girls are able to continue to live in the house despite half of it being burnt down. Even with the vines growing over the house it doesn’t seem like it would be very liveable. The girls get checked in on and Helen Clarke makes a statement that the townspeople didn’t mean it the way they took it? Or something like that? That was bizarre to me. How else were the girls to take people destroying their homes.
But after sitting with the book for a couple of days, I began to become ok with the ending because it became almost fairy tale like to me. Where things don’t necessarily have to have a perfect ending and be tied up nicely. In fact, the ending became deliciously creepy to me with people leaving baskets on the front doorstep filled with food as an apology for their past behavior. Children daring each other to go close to the door. Stories forming about the old women who lived in the house still. But we as readers actually get to see what’s BEHIND the door. And I almost felt like the whole book was an homage to these sorts of folktales and legends that live in small towns. That it showed us the humans behind the doors. The real people who take the food that’s left in the basket and how they’re not creepy old witches, but people that we can feel for despite our initial questions about them. But of course these are just my own thoughts on the book. I would LOVE to hear your own thoughts on the ending.
What did you think of these last two chapters and even more, what did you think of the novel as a whole? Did you enjoy it? Were you disappointed by the ending? Are you likely to read more Jackson after reading this novel? I know I am!
Also, I just want to thank everyone for participating in this discussion!! It’s meant so much to me (who was a bundle of nerves to begin with!) and I just had so much fun hosting this. Hope everyone enjoyed it!!
Jen - Devourer of Books 8:49 am on November 10, 2010 Permalink |
I definitely agree, it felt like a window into how fairy tales/haunted house stories get created. I do wish we’d gotten a bit more about Merricat’s motivations for killing her family, though. If I remember correctly all we really got was why she put the poison in the sugar.
Chris 11:15 am on November 10, 2010 Permalink |
I meant to bring that up, Jen…I wish we would’ve gotten more of her motivations too. I think that’s mainly what I was talking about with finding the ending anti-climatic…the murder mystery part of the book just sort of dropped off!
Heather 5:20 am on November 11, 2010 Permalink |
I know we don’t get a clear cut “this is why she did it” sentence in the book, but I think we get clues all along. How many people does she wish dead in this book? And it’s all people who have not “been kind” to her. Considering she was what, 12? when this happened, I expect it was because they were unkind to her. In her opinion of course. Maybe it was being sent to bed without her supper?
I’ll be back with my thoughts about the ending. I need a few more days to digest!
Jen - Devourer of Books 11:25 pm on November 11, 2010 Permalink |
Yes, you’re right of course Heather, but who *doesn’t* wish people dead at certain times? Most of us don’t poison the sugar bowl! On the other hand, she is clearly eccentric at best, mentally ill at worst.
Jen - Devourer of Books 1:09 pm on November 22, 2010 Permalink
Thanks so much for all of this, Chris!
Frankie 11:03 am on November 12, 2010 Permalink |
So we all seem to have a incomplete feeling. I can’t say I loved it but I did like it. I think the discussion helped a great deal. I couldn’t understand the violence from the town people. why not let the place burn? why save it and then destroy it? But if they let it burn then the tale of 2 crazy ladies wouldn’t get started. I just can’t help thinking there should be more. Do the girls live in the kitchen and basement? Will Charles or someone come back and steal or hurt the girls
Jen - Devourer of Books 8:43 pm on November 14, 2010 Permalink |
Well, I think that the firemen who came were just doing their duty and saving the house, but then once the rest of the town followed them, their fear and dislike boiled over into violence.
Patti Smith 10:59 pm on November 12, 2010 Permalink |
I’ve been digesting this story and letting my imagination run away with me for the last few days…like Heather I’ve wondered and at this point suspected very strongly that there is an underlying reason for Merricat’s hate. I believe at this point in her life she is most definitely mentally ill…but I think there must be a cause…was she a victim of incest or molestation? Did Constance find out and try to protect her…both from the abuse and then from the murder? The townspeople are cruel to her bc they think she’s strange…her sister got away with murder and they’ve imagined all these crazy things that go on behind their closed doors. Happens all the time. People think they know others…when many times they really don’t know them at all.